history of knowledge by charles van doren

Van Doren includes short accounts of virtually every major discovery throughout history-including scientific knowledge, religious beliefs, as well as geographical knowledge. This is a history book that is not only very interesting reading, but should be the first history book that anyone interested in world history should buy. What is amazing is that Van Doren manages to do this in only 412 pages and manages to present a huge amount of information that is also very fascinating reading. Van Doren sets out to present a complete history of human knowledge-starting with the ancient civilizations and continuing through modern times, as well as extrapolating into the future. 'A History of Knowledge' is a stunning book, in both its scope and its clarity. Over the years, he's authored many books, including 'The Joy of Reading' and 'How to Read a Book' (which he co-authored with Mortimer Adler). He was later found to have conspired with the producers of the show in commiting fraud by being coached before the show on the questions to be asked and their answers.Īfter the quiz show scandal, Charles, who was also a professor, was banned from teaching and ultimately became an editor at the Encyclopedia Britannica. Charles Van Doren is the well off and highly cultured son of a well-known university professor who made a number of appearances on a TV quiz show in the 1950s. The name of Charles Van Doren showed up recently as the main character of the movie 'Quiz Show'. This work's most redeeming quality may very well be its service as an example of what good historical writing should not be. A scholar such as Van Doren should not be so negligible in his endeavors. Perhaps Van Doren feels that he has proven his scholarly mettle on enough occasions to exempt himself from the ardors of research, for one finds no footnotes or bibliographical information whatsoever in the entire work. Other factual errors can be found in several other passages of the work. Actually it was the Japanese who attacked the Russian fleet at Port Arthur. One key example should illustrate my point: in his discussion of the 1904-05 Russo-Japanese War, Van Doren mistakenly leads us to believe that the Russians attacked the Japanese, thus initiating the war in which the Russians were beaten and humiliated.

Even more shocking is Van Doren's factual inaccuracy. Emanuel Wallerstein, Peter Stearns, and other world systems historians who have done much to bring the West out of its exclusionary ego.

Van Doren would have benefited himself and his work by examining the works of such scholars as L.S. To begin, his work is Western biased, leaving very little space devoted to the remarkable achievements of non-Western civilizations and cultures. Indeed, how anyone with the intellect of Van Doren could write such a flawed and careless piece is almost incomprehensible.

History of knowledge by charles van doren